A cross-sectional study on bacterial contamination on the touchscreens and posterior surfaces of smartphones of emergency department staff.

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Cleaning smartphones of healthcare workers (HCWs) is generally recommended; however, most previous studies on bacterial contamination of smartphones assessed touchscreens alone. This study compared the prevalence of bacterial contamination on touchscreens and posterior surfaces of smartphones owned by HCWs. METHOD: A cross-sectional study of smartphones used by HCWs working at an emergency department (ED) at a Japanese tertiary care hospital was conducted. Bacteria on each surface of the smartphones were isolated separately. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the prevalence of microbial contamination on each surface of the smartphones and the types of associated bacterial species. Fisher's exact test was used to compare dichotomous outcomes. RESULTS: The smartphones of 40 HCWs working in the ED of a Japanese tertiary care hospital were examined. The touchscreens and posterior surfaces were contaminated in 26 (65.0%) and 36 (90.0%) smartphones, respectively, indicating the posterior surface was more frequently contaminated (p = 0.014). Bacillus species and coagulase-negative staphylococci were most frequently isolated from each surface of the smartphones. CONCLUSIONS: The posterior surface of a smartphone was more significantly contaminated with bacteria than the touchscreen. Both surfaces of smartphones need to be cleaned to prevent bacterial contamination in healthcare environments.

Do you have a fixation with alcohol?

Laura Yates discusses what types of wipes are most effective for surface decontamination in the dental practice. Aims & objectives: To inform readers about the different definitions in decontamination To explain why decontamination wipes have increased in popularity To explain the history and use of alcohol in dental decontamination To inform readers about why alcohol alone should not be used on heavily contaminated surfaces Learning outcomes: Readers will understand what role wipes play in the decontamination process and when they should be used Readers will understand the theory behind the use of alcohol in dental decontamination Readers will understand the different options for cleaning and disinfection of surfaces and be able to explain their choice of materials

Simulation with a colour indicator to help reduce contamination during airway management in COVID-19 times: An experience from a tertiary centre in India.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has initiated modified protocols for aerosol-generating procedures. A simulation study using dye was conducted to highlight contamination at intubation and extubation and to encourage adherence to the new COVID-19 protocol among anaesthesia personnel in our institution. METHODS: A video demonstrating the new COVID-19 protocols was circulated in the Department of Anaesthesiology a week prior to the study. Thirty teams, each comprising an anaesthesia resident and a staff technician, were enroled. Each team was asked to demonstrate the steps of preparation, intubation and extubation on a mannequin in a COVID-19 scenario. Checklists were used to assess points of contamination and adherence to the protocols. Following debriefing, a repeat simulation was conducted. The use of a dye highlighted the points of contamination. The study subjects provided feedback on the usefulness of the session and practical difficulties encountered in adapting to the new protocols. RESULTS: The average contamination scores decreased by 3.4 (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.4-4.4, P < 0.001) in the post-debrief session. Adherence to the steps of the modified protocol improved by a score of 2.7 (CI: 3.6-1.83) among anaesthesiologists and by 4.3 (CI: 5.3-3.3) among technicians. Further, 93% felt that the use of the colour indicator reinforced awareness of the possible points of contamination. CONCLUSION: Simulation with a low-fidelity mannequin by using colour indicator for secretions is an effective teaching tool to reduce health hazards during airway management in COVID-19 times.

Prevalence of bacterial contamination of touchscreens and posterior surfaces of smartphones owned by healthcare workers: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Mobile phones used by healthcare workers (HCWs) are contaminated with bacteria, but the posterior surface of smartphones has rarely been studied. The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence of microbial contamination of touchscreens and posterior surfaces of smartphones owned by HCWs. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of smartphones used by HCWs employed at two intensive care units at a Japanese tertiary care hospital was performed. Bacteria on each surface of the smartphones were isolated separately. The primary outcomes were the prevalence of microbial contamination on each surface of smartphones and associated bacterial species. Fisher's exact test was used to compare dichotomous outcomes. RESULTS: Eighty-four HCWs participated in this study. The touchscreen and posterior surface were contaminated in 27 (32.1%) and 39 (46.4%) smartphones, respectively, indicating that the posterior surface was more frequently contaminated (p = 0.041). Bacillus species and coagulase-negative staphylococci were isolated from each surface of the smartphones. CONCLUSIONS: The posterior surface of a smartphone was more significantly contaminated with bacteria than the touchscreen, regardless of having a cover. Therefore, routine cleaning of the posterior surface of a smartphone is recommended.

Sampling Methods and Risk Stratification Regarding Environmental Contamination by SARS-CoV-2.

INTRODUCTION: Transmission of COVID-19 through close contact and droplets is well established, but the influence of aerosol and surface contamination remains to be determined. Literature is scarce and inconsistent about the viable virus particles free-distance from infected patients, as well as about different swabbing methods for surface contamination evaluation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the most sensitive method for the assessment of surface contamination, classify the likelihood of environmental contamination in risk zones and compare the environmental contamination between oxygenation and ventilatory support. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Swabs from potentially contaminated surfaces in a COVID-19 ward, with patients treated with different types of oxygen and ventilatory support, were collected. Three types of swabs were compared in order to evaluate the most sensitive collection method. For risk zone categorization, areas were divided according to the distance from the patient. RESULTS: Of the 63 swabs collected, 17 (27%) tested positive for the presence of SARS-CoV-2. The highest positivity rate was observed with the sterile premoistened swab with saline (n = 8; 38%), but without statistically significant differences. The highest number of positive samples were collected from the high-risk zones, specifically those located one meter from the patient (n = 13; 48%), with statistically significant differences. Only the rooms of patients supported with non-invasive ventilation or high-flow nasal cannula had evidence of bedroom contamination, with 45% and 27% of swab positivity, with statistically significant differences. DISCUSSION: Our findings favour the premoistened swab without transport medium for surface contamination assessment, even though without statistical differences. A statistically significant trend supporting the division in risk zones, according to the distance from the patient, was also identified. The higher positivity rate from the non-invasive ventilation and high-flow nasal cannula bedrooms suggests a significant association between ventilatory strategies and surface contamination, probably due to higher particle dispersion. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the use of the sterile premoistened swab without preservation medium, the classification of risk areas considering the distance from the patient, and the variability of RNA dispersion between oxygenation and ventilatory support.

Introdução: A transmissão da COVID-19 através do contacto e gotículas está bem estabelecida, mas a importância da sua transmissão através do aerossol e da contaminação das superfícies permanece por determinar. A literatura é escassa e inconsistente em relação à distância mínima livre de partículas víricas, desde um paciente, e também acerca dos mais adequados métodos de colheita de zaragatoas para avaliação da contaminação das superfícies. Os objectivos deste estudo foram avaliar qual o método mais sensível para avaliação da contaminação de superfícies, classificar a contaminação ambiental de acordo com zonas de risco e comparar a contaminação ambiental sob diferentes dispositivos para oxigenoterapia e suporte ventilatório. Material e Métodos: Realizamos colheitas de zaragatoas em superfícies potencialmente contaminadas numa ala COVID-19, onde se encontravam doentes sob diferentes dispositivos para oxigenoterapia e suporte ventilatório. Para avaliar o método de recolha mais sensível para verificação da contaminação das superfícies, comparámos três tipos de zaragatoas. Para a classificação das zonas de risco, dividimos as áreas de acordo com a distância ao doente. Resultados: Das 63 zaragatoas, 17 (27%) testaram positivo para SARS-CoV-2 (27%). A maior positividade foi observada na zaragatoa estéril pré-humedecida com soro fisiológico (n = 8; 38%), mas sem significância estatística. O maior número de amostras positivas obteve-se nas zonas de alto risco, especialmente aquelas a um metro do paciente (n = 13; 48%), com diferenças significativas. Apenas os quartos dos doentes sob ventilação não invasiva e cânula nasal de alto fluxo tiveram evidência de contaminação com 45% e 27% de positividade das zaragatoas, e significância estatística. Discussão: Os nossos resultados favorecem a zaragatoa estéril pré-humedecida sem meio de preservação para avaliação da contaminação das superfícies, embora sem significância estatística. Os resultados suportam também com significância estatística a divisão em zonas de risco de acordo com a distância ao doente. A maior positividade obtida nos quartos dos pacientes que se encontravam a utilizar ventilação não invasiva e cânula nasal de alto fluxo sugere uma associação, com significância, entre as estratégias ventilatória e a contaminação ambiental, provavelmente relacionada com uma maior dispersão das partículas. Conclusão: Os nossos resultados apoiam o uso da zaragatoa estéril pré-humedecida sem meio de preservação, a classificação das áreas de risco considerando a distância ao doente, e a variabilidade da dispersão do RNA entre diferentes dispositivos para oxigenoterapia e ventilação.

Prevention related to the occupational exposure of health professionals workers in the COVID-19 scenario

Objective: to describe the main recommended actions on prevention actions related to occupational exposure of health professionals working at COVID-19, available until March 2020. Content: The current pandemic disease caused by the new SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus has its transmission favored by close and unprotected contact with secretions or excretions from infected patients, mainly through salivary droplets. Organizational prevention practices should be prioritized, since patient's arrival at the health service, optimizing the flow of care, the first care and during health care actions, to minimize occupational exposure to the biological agent. Health professionals classified as a risk group should be removed from activities at risk of contamination. Those contaminated or adulterated must remain in quarantine to minimize the spread of COVID-19. Final considerations: care to avoid contamination of workers in this pandemic by the new coronavirus must be prioritized, prevented from affecting the assistance to the population that seeks assistance in health services. © 2020, Centro de Estudos da Faculdade de Enfermagem da UERJ. All rights reserved.